Morphine vs. Harmor in ease of patch handling
Return to “Morphine - Presets & Programming”
[You can only see part of this thread as you are not logged in to the forums]
Morphine vs. Harmor in ease of patch handling
Am I understanding correctly that once you save a patch in Morphine you no longer need the wav file of the sample you have resynthesized? My experiments with it seems to indicate this. With Harmor I think you must save the original sample along with the patch, which is a little awkward for me. If you don't with Morphine, then it will be the more useful VST for me for resynthesis (although Harmor is great without using resynthesis). I am bit puzzled why one does and one does not though.
Re: Morphine vs. Harmor in ease of patch handling
Now i'm curious too.
Maybe this is why Harmor...
Re: Morphine vs. Harmor in ease of patch handling
all of my plugins load the files instead of emb...