English is not my native language but i'm pretty sure that you assign parameters to a controller, not links to a controller.
The link is the result of the assignment/connection of a parameter to a controller.
So...
Why if this list...lists all the targets ( which are parameters), the list is called Target links?
These are not links, these are parameters.
Imho it is not correct to say that the target is a link because the link = the connection to a target, not the target itself.
Am I wrong?
So its purpose and title would be clearer if named Target Parameters. Or Linked Parameters.
Seems definitely more logic and clear than "Target Links"
The targets listed are not links, but parameters.
Does my reasoning make sense?
Nothing serious but I'd be happy to understand the explanation for that weird (to my ears) sounding name.
Cheers!
Shouldn't these be named Target Parameters rather than Target Links?
Return to “FL Studio Users Forum (Looptalk)”
Forum rules
Please read them here.
Please read them here.
[You can only see part of this thread as you are not logged in to the forums]
Shouldn't these be named Target Parameters rather than Target Links?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Technical Support
- Wed Mar 27, 2024 10:25 am
Re: Shouldn't these be named Target Parameters rather than Target Links?
Target links make sense to me, as it shows the ...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.