it really is. complete crap.
if fl studio was efficient, like it used to be, then writing music would not be a pain in the ass, it would be fun.
so many people with really bad attitudes, want to make life harder. why did you guys make fl studio 20 years ago anyway????
add the channels! in the mixer. it's as simple as a feature update, could be done in less than a week. we're the customers, buying your software, that has become shit! because you haven't been listening to the customer input.
now you have a really terrible mess. of a software, that USED to be epic. it isn't anymore.
the programming efficiency is terrible.
Return to “FL Studio Users Forum (Looptalk)”
Forum rules
Please read them here.
Please read them here.
[You can only see part of this thread as you are not logged in to the forums]
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
youtube in 2007. had a friendly user interface,...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
youtube in 2007. had a friendly user interface,...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
fl studio 9 setting menu was CONCISE, and effic...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
another thought, is that you could try adding t...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
take armin van buuren. his videos used to be so...
-
- Site Admin
- Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:33 pm
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
TranceCrafter wrote:it really is. complete crap...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
the music was easier to make back then too....
-
- Site Admin
- Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:35 pm
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
TranceCrafter wrote:the music was easier to mak...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
@scott.
it's the same way in the musician comm...
-
- Site Admin
- Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:38 pm
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
TranceCrafter wrote:@scott.
it's the same way ...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
I bet, that if every click done in the piano ro...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
Scott wrote:Take that entropy!
it's not entrop...
Last edited by TranceCrafter on Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:49 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Site Admin
- Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:43 pm
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
TranceCrafter wrote:I bet, that if every click ...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
Scott wrote:
That's life.
No. it's not. life ...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
Scott wrote:TranceCrafter wrote:I bet, that if ...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
ardour is cool
if it worked on a tablet, unde...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
TranceCrafter wrote:another thought, what if yo...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
TranceCrafter wrote:Scott wrote:
That's life.
...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
TranceCrafter wrote:it really is. complete crap...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
The forum list (as represented on my mobile dev...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
TranceCrafter wrote:
life is beautiful when pe...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
A bit of the old familiarity breeding contempt ...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
John Judd wrote:The forum list (as represented ...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
TranceCrafter wrote:Scott wrote:
That's life.
...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
TranceCrafter wrote:John Judd wrote:The forum l...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
Sometimes i get the impression that some people...
-
- Content Creator
- Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:54 am
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
TranceCrafter wrote:I bet, that if every click ...
-
- Site Admin
- Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:59 am
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
TheDichotomist wrote:At least show them Ardour....
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
mikers wrote:TranceCrafter wrote:
life is beau...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
TranceCrafter wrote:It's not garbage.
It most ...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
It's a poor craftsman that blames his tools.
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
Labelwhore wrote:It's a poor craftsman that bla...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
my average mixdown needs to be able to handle a...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
TranceCrafter wrote:my average mixdown needs to...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
Scott wrote:TranceCrafter wrote:@scott.
it's t...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
TheDichotomist wrote:
So, maybe that will brigh...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
TranceCrafter wrote:my average mixdown needs to...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
dude, fl wouldn't be where it is today, without...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
Yes, I see that too: it is all about you after ...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
Scott wrote:TranceCrafter wrote:the music was e...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
TranceCrafter wrote:Labelwhore wrote:It's a poo...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
I am.... SO confused.
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
Masterfireheart wrote:I am.... SO confused.
Don...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
Roadcrew worker is just upset because he's real...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
compile an exe of fl studio with more channels,...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
Sound-Elements wrote:compile an exe of fl studi...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
Scott wrote:TheDichotomist wrote:At least show ...
Re: the programming efficiency is terrible.
Scott wrote:TranceCrafter wrote:it really is. c...