Next Version: Bigger peakscope or draggable decks?

Get support here - http://support.image-line.com/redirect/Gibson-Stanton-Deckadance

Return to “DeckaTalk”

Forum rules
Deckadance is no longer an Image-Line product. For support please go here - http://support.image-line.com/redirect/Gibson-Stanton-Deckadance
[You can only see part of this thread as you are not logged in to the forums]
jimmivalentino
Fri Nov 14, 2014 12:12 pm

1 x

Next Version: Bigger peakscope or draggable decks?

For a next or future version (unsure of how far away next version actually is), can you please make the peakscope bigger, or redesign Deckadance so that tracks can be stacked upon one another like in Rekordbox 3.0 so that it is easier to manually sync and identify key points and issues whilst the track is going?

I love the way the new Rekordbox stacks the A+B decks on top of each other, it makes it even easier to beatmatch, and allows you to find similarities (to help with cueing on the spot), and help identify wrong BPMs instantly. In Deckadance this could become an extremely useful feature if the user is only running two decks. Maybe it could work so that you have the option to drag and drop each deck to the position you want in deckadance, letting each deck behave more like oversized toolbars (which would also help when using multiple screens). However, I know that this probably won't get implemented, so instead I ask that you at least make the size of the peakscope bigger and less compressed vertically, so that they are easier to read because right now they are a good idea but mostly useless because they are too small - or at least maybe a user controllable zoom so that we can make it move faster/slower if we want it to.

Return to “DeckaTalk”