Don't you think the tracks should remained labeled even when you reset the track?
If it cleared the generators which are routed to it (which would be terrible), that would make sense, but I dont' see the point to have them cleared as it is now.
love the new mixer reset function but should it leave labels?
Return to “FL Studio Users Forum (Looptalk)”
Forum rules
Please read them here.
Please read them here.
[You can only see part of this thread as you are not logged in to the forums]
Re: love the new mixer reset function but should it leave labels?
I don't really think tracks should remain label...
Re: love the new mixer reset function but should it leave labels?
I guess I can see how it would be useful in som...
Re: love the new mixer reset function but should it leave labels?
or perhaps just a "reset and keep labels" optio...
Re: love the new mixer reset function but should it leave labels?
Reset and empty.
And clear instead of reset wh...
Re: love the new mixer reset function but should it leave labels?
I guess, this function is just a macro, which l...
Re: love the new mixer reset function but should it leave lab
Trancit wrote:I guess, this function is just a ...
Re: love the new mixer reset function but should it leave labels?
Trancit wrote:
If so, I wouldn´t expect any cha...
Re: love the new mixer reset function but should it leave labels?
Mister Nosu wrote:Trancit wrote:
If so, I would...
-
- Content Creator
- Fri Feb 16, 2018 3:13 pm
Re: love the new mixer reset function but should it leave labels?
Mister Nosu wrote:Trancit wrote:
If so, I would...
Re: love the new mixer reset function but should it leave labels?
Trancit wrote:Mister Nosu wrote:Trancit wrote:
...