It seems like there should be a better naming convention for certain initialized controls. Look at this example:
The first initialized control for a level fader makes sense: Mixer Track Name - Control.
The second initialized control doesn't. It goes Effect Name - Mixer Track Name - Control.
Wouldn't it make more sense for it to be Mixer Track Name - Effect Name - Control? Example: Instrument - Fast Dist - Mix Level. Each section of the name would be following the audio flow, getting gradually more specific that way.
Also, now that I think about it, why can't these initialized controls be reorganized? That would make it easier to discover which automation clips need initialized controls. Or better yet, make a macro or something that automatically creates initialized controls for all automation clips based on wherever their first point is.
Better Initialized Controls Section
[You can only see part of this thread as you are not logged in to the forums]
Re: Better Initialized Controls Section
I agree. Though I recommend disabling "Initiali...
Re: Better Initialized Controls Section
You're right. That section probably doesn't eve...