Better Initialized Controls Section

Post your ideas and suggestions here

Return to “To Do”

[You can only see part of this thread as you are not logged in to the forums]
jlevil
Thu Jun 08, 2023 8:01 am

x

Better Initialized Controls Section

It seems like there should be a better naming convention for certain initialized controls. Look at this example:

FL IC Names.png

The first initialized control for a level fader makes sense: Mixer Track Name - Control.

The second initialized control doesn't. It goes Effect Name - Mixer Track Name - Control.

Wouldn't it make more sense for it to be Mixer Track Name - Effect Name - Control? Example: Instrument - Fast Dist - Mix Level. Each section of the name would be following the audio flow, getting gradually more specific that way.

Also, now that I think about it, why can't these initialized controls be reorganized? That would make it easier to discover which automation clips need initialized controls. Or better yet, make a macro or something that automatically creates initialized controls for all automation clips based on wherever their first point is.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Nayah9
Sat Jun 10, 2023 12:47 am

x

Re: Better Initialized Controls Section

I agree. Though I recommend disabling "Initiali...

jlevil
Sat Jun 10, 2023 5:20 pm

x

Re: Better Initialized Controls Section

You're right. That section probably doesn't eve...


Return to “To Do”